Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Ann Clin Lab Sci ; 52(6): 880-883, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2169395

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The conjunction of the coronavirus disease lockdown and the use of illicit drugs suggests the potential increase in drug usage and opioid deaths. Because of other studies, we felt the need to examine if the lockdown has caused a change in the drug intake of our population of substance abuse and pain management patients. Our initial study indicated no increase in the use of illicit and antianxiety drugs. This study is a continuation of that work. MATERIALS: Urine drug testing is a strategy to reduce harm to patients in pain management and substance abuse treatment programs. We analyzed trends in the clinical drug testing patterns of urine specimens sent by substance abuse and pain clinics to monitor their patients. These specimens were tested by a national clinical laboratory using LC-MS/MS definitive methods. The time frame of these comparative observations was the past six years, including the two years of the pandemic. RESULTS: We observed a 30% reduction in test requests during the second quarter of 2020, the number of test requests and specimens submitted was similar during other times of the six-year period. The observed drug use pattern was similar to the earlier study. Among the patients tested, positivity decreased greatly for the illicit drugs heroin and cocaine but increased for methamphetamine and fentanyl. Use of the antidepressant and anxiolytic drugs remained consistent or declined for some drugs, relative to pre-pandemic patterns. The percent of patients prescribed the opiates morphine and oxycodone decreased, while the use of hydrocodone increased. Positivity for the drug gabapentin increased greatly. The use of alcohol did not increase significantly during the lockdown period. CONCLUSION: In summary, these findings demonstrate relatively consistent drug use, with decreased positivity for high-risk drugs and dangerous drug combinations. We speculate that monitoring of these patients mitigates the possibility of drug misuse and potential overdose and is in concordance with the goals of these monitoring programs.


Subject(s)
Illicit Drugs , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Chromatography, Liquid , Pandemics , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Pain/drug therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance Abuse Detection/methods , Illicit Drugs/adverse effects , Ethanol/therapeutic use
2.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 46(6): 1094-1102, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1956674

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Investigations show that medications for alcohol use disorders (MAUD) reduce heavy drinking and relapses. However, only 1.6% of individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD) receive MAUD across care settings. The epidemiology of MAUD prescribing in the acute care setting is incompletely described. We hypothesized that MAUD would be under prescribed in inpatient acute care hospital settings compared to the outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient substance use treatment settings. METHODS: We evaluated electronic health record (EHR) data from adult patients with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10) alcohol-related diagnosis in the University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) system between January 1, 2016 and 31 December, 2019. Data from patients with an ICD-10 diagnosis code for opioid use disorder and those receiving MAUD prior to their first alcohol-related episode were excluded. The primary outcome was prescribing of MAUD, defined by prescription of naltrexone, acamprosate, and/or disulfiram. We performed bivariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent predictors of MAUD prescribing at UCHealth. RESULTS: We identified 48,421 unique patients with 136,205 alcohol-related encounters at UCHealth. Encounters occurred in the ED (42%), inpatient acute care (17%), inpatient substance use treatment (18%), or outpatient primary care (12%) settings. Only 2270 (5%) patients received MAUD across all settings. Female sex and addiction medicine consults positively predicted MAUD prescribing. In contrast, encounters outside inpatient substance use treatment, Hispanic ethnicity, and black or non-white race were negative predictors of MAUD prescribing. Compared to inpatient substance use treatment, inpatient acute care hospitalizations for AUD was associated with a 93% reduced odds of receiving MAUD. CONCLUSIONS: AUD-related ED and inpatient acute care hospital encounters in our healthcare system were common. Nevertheless, prescriptions for MAUD were infrequent in this population, particularly in inpatient settings. Our findings suggest that the initiation of MAUD for patients with alcohol-related diagnoses in acute care settings deserves additional evaluation.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Opioid-Related Disorders , Adult , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Colorado/epidemiology , Delivery of Health Care , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Naltrexone/therapeutic use
3.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt B): 408-411, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1664641

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ethanol ablation (EA) is a non-surgical option for the treatment of benign cystic thyroid nodules. This study summarizes our preliminary experience with the efficacy and safety of EA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing EA for symptomatic, benign, cystic and predominantly cystic (≥75%) thyroid nodules. Baseline nodule volume, cosmetic scores, and symptom scores were assessed, as well as volume reduction ratio (VRR), cosmetic and symptom scores at post-procedure months 1, 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS: 31 patients underwent an uncomplicated EA for a single cyst with an average volume of 21.3 cc (range: 1.7-101.4 cc). Follow-up was limited by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mean nodule VRRs were 66 ± 20% (1 m, n = 17), 87 ± 15% (3 m, n = 9), 72 ± 20% (6 m, n = 7), and 78% (12 m, n = 3). Mean symptom and cosmetic scores decreased concurrently post-procedure. CONCLUSION: EA is a safe, effective option for benign cystic and predominantly cystic thyroid nodules.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Catheter Ablation , Thyroid Nodule , Catheter Ablation/methods , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Nodule/surgery , Treatment Outcome
5.
Subst Abus ; 42(2): 140-147, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1180374

ABSTRACT

Background: The COVID-19 crisis presents new challenges and opportunities in managing alcohol use disorders, particularly for people unable to shelter in place due to homelessness or other reasons. Requiring abstinence for shelter engagement is impractical for many with severe alcohol use disorders and poses a modifiable barrier to self-isolation orders. Managed alcohol programs (MAPs) have successfully increased housing adherence for those with physical alcohol dependence in Canada, but to our knowledge, they have not been implemented in the United States. To avoid life-threatening alcohol withdrawal syndromes and to support adherence to COVID-19 self-isolation and quarantine orders, MAPs were piloted by the public health departments of San Francisco and Alameda counties. Development of MAPs: We describe implementation of a first-in-the-nation alcohol use disorder intervention of a MAP that emerged at three public health isolation settings within San Francisco and Alameda counties in California. All three interventions utilized a similar process to develop the protocol and implement the MAP that included identification of champions for system-level advocacy and engagement of stakeholders. Implementation of MAPs: We describe the creation and implementation of the distinct protocols. We provide examples of iterative changes to workflow processes and key lessons learned pertaining to protocol development, acceptability by stakeholders, alcohol procurement, documentation, and assessment. We discuss safety considerations, noting that there were no deaths or serious adverse events in any of the patients of the MAP during the 2-month implementation period. Conclusions: MAP pilots have been implemented in the US to aid adherence to isolation and quarantine setting guidelines. Lessons learned provide a foundation for their expansion as a recognized public health intervention for individuals with severe alcohol use disorders who are unable to stabilize within existing care systems. Based on the success of MAP implementation, efforts are under way to investigate alcohol management in homeless populations more broadly.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , Harm Reduction , Housing , Ill-Housed Persons , Quarantine/methods , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/prevention & control , Alcohol Abstinence , California , Central Nervous System Depressants/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Depressants/therapeutic use , Communicable Disease Control , Ethanol/adverse effects , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Humans , Implementation Science , Pilot Projects , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , San Francisco , Stakeholder Participation , Workflow
7.
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ; 34: 2058738420941757, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-721278

ABSTRACT

Public health measures are essential to protect against COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The nose and the mouth represent entry portals for the COVID 19. Saline Nasal Irrigations (SNIs) can reduce the viral load in the nasal cavities. Oral rinse with antimicrobial agents is efficacious in reducing the viral load in oral fluids. We advocate the inclusion of SNIs and ethanol oral rinses as additional measures to the current public health measures, to prevent and control the transmission of any respiratory infectious disease, including COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Mouth/virology , Nasal Cavity/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Betacoronavirus/physiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Humans , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2 , Viral Load/drug effects
8.
Alcohol ; 88: 29-32, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-650388

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly worldwide and led to the deaths of thousands of people. To date, there is not any vaccine or specific antiviral medicine that can prevent or treat this virus. This caused panic among people who try their best to prevent being infected. In Iran, methanol poisoning was reported and led to the death of hundreds of people in several provinces. The incident occurred after a rumor circulated in the country that drinking alcohol (ethanol) can cure or prevent being infected by COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Communication , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Ethanol/therapeutic use , Methanol/poisoning , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Poisoning/mortality , Solvents/poisoning , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking , Alcoholic Beverages , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Drug Contamination , Female , Food Contamination , Humans , Iran/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Poisoning/epidemiology , Poisoning/etiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Solvents/therapeutic use , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL